There has been quite a hot debate in the press lately on the concept of “most liveable city”. Mercer’s, the Economist Intelligence Unit, Tyler Brulé’s Monocle and Micheal Skapinker on the Financial Times (“There is more to city life than convenience”), everybody joins the fight.
The ranking is indeed tricky. In the 80s and early 90s I remember Triest being always ranked as “one of the wealthiest cities in Italy”. So why so many graduates were leaving the town? Maybe because Triest is an old town from a demographic point of view, and the number of empty nestlers who had T-bonds in the bank were a measure of wealth? Or because in Triest many people go to the theater(s) on a regular basis and theater in Italy was considered elitarian? Italians are supposed to be fond of calcio, right?
I guess that focusing on what motivates a CEO to live in London or Shanghai is not representative of a city’s attractiveness. The possibility that kids, students, elderly, families, single women, with various levels of income can share a metropolitan micro-cosmos makes what is called “a city”. Using public transport, going to school, making use of parks and gardens, sharing the public space safely, job opportunities, careers in the public, private, no profit sector. Gateway of ideas, incentive to share them. Mix of different age groups. But also nationalities, orientations.
Definitely, opportunities matter. But opportunities are not only a better paid job. They may be also a good public education system. A reasonably priced real estate market. Transportation which is not clogging citizens in their cars for 2 hours every working day (and weekends). Opportunity means not only salary, but also the value for money that can be bought with that salary in a specific city.
So, among all rankings, I looked at my personal fundamentals and you know what? Monocle’s ranking makes sense to me. It is skewed towards environmental policies, and I guess this is becoming increasingly important going forward. After all, we breath the same air, regardless of our disposable income. Living in gated communities (by fences, like in Brazil, or by policies, like in London) is not my cup of tea. The problem is…too many cities are growing fences at the moment… Continue reading ‘back to fundamentals…yours, essentially’