
The articles I read about the exhibition were positive but not enthusiastic. They spoke about a “missed opportunity”. But I always like to go and make my own mind about things. To set up an exhibition on this theme is not easy.
I spent a few hours in the exhibition. It is quite vast and requires a lot of focus and attention. There are countless objects and documents. At first it seems that – as in any exhibition – there are a few important objects per room, and the rest is the filling. It is not the case. Like in Goethe’s prose, every word counts and if you remove just one, it doesn’t feel quite right.
The smallest object can hit you with the force of the planned banality of evil. You have to start again, and follow the chronological path. Because this is history, and here you don’t “navigate”. No jumps and no distractions: you follow the events. Because this is the only way to see the pattern.
Everything is linked. That commercial, selling cigarettes carrying the name of a drummer, is kitsch and looks just plain silly, like 90% of advertising. But it brought funding to the party, was a vehicle of consensus and a powerful role model fuelling identification well before the Marlboro Man. That top hat too, much less “popular”, needs to be put into context. And that upper class drawing room picture. What about the clay candle holder? Filling? In a sense, yes. Another piece of the puzzle, filling up the minds of people of that time, giving them further supporting evidence that yes, they were right in following the mainstream.

To visit it once is not enough. The most impressive thing is the quantity of visitors: adults, families, youths, teenagers and children. On a quieter day the absorption of the exhibition contents would be easier. Taking in all at once is not possible without losing something in the process. I will go through the exhibition again.
Still the sheer volume of visitors is an essential part of the experience. When you look around you it’s the visitors – and even more their attitude – who are the heart of the exhibition, and the awareness.
The first conclusion is pretty obvious but only with hindsight. There are no populist dictators without a cheering crowd. No populists without the raw material: people.
The second conclusion is a confirmation of a feeling. That “the pattern” is very disturbing. Colin Crouch wrote about it. It’s not a circle. History is not repeating. But post-democracy in Italy is in full bloom. After WWII democracy rose, hit an inflexion point, and is now decreasing. Not coming full circle back to square one, but heading, drawing a bell shape, towards a lower level of democracy, a high control on the media and a dangerously high level of populism.
An exhibition like this is useful, even if probably not sufficient as a vaccine. I only know that I have never seen something like this on fascism in my country and probably I will not see it in the near future. Neither will I read critical articles saying that this exhibition was not enough.